After an evening of listening to cabaret music-making, most of the songs led into with stream-of-consciousness-type comments on recent news stories or events in the life of the singer/songwriter, the question arose in my mind as I contemplated preparing the printed program for the in-house recital I will play tomorrow... why have a printed program?
Without the distraction of a printed program, the roomful of people listens for what is coming in a way that is overwhelmingly persuasive. Nobody knows what is about to happen, sometimes not even the bass player who has an uncanny ability to read the singer's mind, even when she changes it at the last minute, or changes key.... So when the moody intro turns out to yield a hilarious song everyone is caught off-guard and the laughter is immediate and deep.
Deep in both senses: the moody intro gives an edge to the laughter indicating that nothing is probably as simple as it seems.
Probably the jazziest song of the evening was about death, yup. What was hilarious about it? Everything, especially the simple fact that we were all together facing it, sooner or later, or now.
The printed program should be a gateway to participatory listening. Maybe I'll scrap it and see what happens. Part of the problem with it is that it presupposes too much on the part of the listener, not in the Muz App sense of knowledge, but simply in terms of whether you are about to hear a song or a dance or some kind of intellectual exercise perhaps somber perhaps rollicking. But the music may actually belie its title. Maybe it's not the serious piece you ordinarily expect of a "fugue." I have to think some more about this problem.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
A Celebration Worthy of the Name
Today* is my birthday. It will be celebrated, ironically, with an evening of chamber music shared with friends old and new. The irony of this did not actually hit me until I began that last sentence.
It lies in the realization that the traditional familial birthday celebration among European families of a certain social standing would include chamber music readings for which every family member would have been assigned a part. When I was privileged to take part in that culture, which I did during my Fulbright year, I was aware of two things: 1) how wonderful it was and 2) how utterly out of whack that would be in terms of modern American life: the assumption of conformity within the family seemed at the time and still seems un-American to me. I firmly believe that every generation has to find or make its own musical expression.
And here I will be, playing the Brahms Horn Trio together with my son Jacob on natural horn and Gregor Kitzis playing violin, and the whole undertaking was Jacob's idea. Among those listening will be my daughter Rachelle, a self-taught singer/songwriter/musician on all sorts of instruments, and a listener beyond compare.
Unbelievable. Such a thing could never happen.
*The post is written several days before it is posted....
It lies in the realization that the traditional familial birthday celebration among European families of a certain social standing would include chamber music readings for which every family member would have been assigned a part. When I was privileged to take part in that culture, which I did during my Fulbright year, I was aware of two things: 1) how wonderful it was and 2) how utterly out of whack that would be in terms of modern American life: the assumption of conformity within the family seemed at the time and still seems un-American to me. I firmly believe that every generation has to find or make its own musical expression.
And here I will be, playing the Brahms Horn Trio together with my son Jacob on natural horn and Gregor Kitzis playing violin, and the whole undertaking was Jacob's idea. Among those listening will be my daughter Rachelle, a self-taught singer/songwriter/musician on all sorts of instruments, and a listener beyond compare.
Unbelievable. Such a thing could never happen.
*The post is written several days before it is posted....
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Listening in Advance
Much fuss is made about the necessity of hearing in advance of playing. I would like to make an argument for that not always being such a good idea.
A professionally trained musician is under a lot of pressure: to play the right notes, play them on time, and cause as little trouble as possible so that the rehearsal can proceed according to schedule and we can get on with it.
But every once in a while even the best-trained professional is brought up short by notes she has played a million times within just the past month but which present in such unlikely context that they cannot simply be played and be done with it.
I am thinking of one well-known professional flutist whose specialty is new music. She told me once that, no matter what else was on the program, a trio by Haydn always took the most rehearsing. And this from a member of a prominent ensemble who, when they have to premiere a work, analyze it in terms of how many rehearsal hours it will take to get it together.
People who always only listen in advance risk making up their minds before giving music a chance to be what it is.
A professionally trained musician is under a lot of pressure: to play the right notes, play them on time, and cause as little trouble as possible so that the rehearsal can proceed according to schedule and we can get on with it.
But every once in a while even the best-trained professional is brought up short by notes she has played a million times within just the past month but which present in such unlikely context that they cannot simply be played and be done with it.
I am thinking of one well-known professional flutist whose specialty is new music. She told me once that, no matter what else was on the program, a trio by Haydn always took the most rehearsing. And this from a member of a prominent ensemble who, when they have to premiere a work, analyze it in terms of how many rehearsal hours it will take to get it together.
People who always only listen in advance risk making up their minds before giving music a chance to be what it is.
Monday, September 8, 2014
Why are Some Pieces so Long?
It used to bug me when I was a child that some pieces seemed to go on forever, especially the slow ones.
Thinking back on those feelings I see myself seated far back in an auditorium the size of Chicago's Orchestra Hall, supposed to be grateful to be there, but baffled as to what it was all about.
As a professional chamber musician I spent countless hours listening to performance tapes of complex works like piano trios, quartets and quintets--Dvorak comes first to mind in this regard. His music perhaps more than that of any other composer is crafted to cause tonal instability to arise not because of structural reasons but strictly out of the auditory excitement of now this player, now that.
The good musician does not stop this excitement from affecting the course of the work, perhaps by throwing it momentarily out of tune, or causing some jagged entrances or other rhythmic upheaval. All too often a well-meaning guest player would pull it all back in order, stressing the repeat aspects of a "theme" even though in entirely differently tonalities rather than relishing the variation aspects so skillfully composed into the work.
Trained to expect repetition where there is none we are not truly immersed in what is happening. The music seems to never end.
Thinking back on those feelings I see myself seated far back in an auditorium the size of Chicago's Orchestra Hall, supposed to be grateful to be there, but baffled as to what it was all about.
As a professional chamber musician I spent countless hours listening to performance tapes of complex works like piano trios, quartets and quintets--Dvorak comes first to mind in this regard. His music perhaps more than that of any other composer is crafted to cause tonal instability to arise not because of structural reasons but strictly out of the auditory excitement of now this player, now that.
The good musician does not stop this excitement from affecting the course of the work, perhaps by throwing it momentarily out of tune, or causing some jagged entrances or other rhythmic upheaval. All too often a well-meaning guest player would pull it all back in order, stressing the repeat aspects of a "theme" even though in entirely differently tonalities rather than relishing the variation aspects so skillfully composed into the work.
Trained to expect repetition where there is none we are not truly immersed in what is happening. The music seems to never end.
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Touch: A Thing of the Pianistic Past?
As more and more people form their impressions of music from recordings it becomes harder and harder to make a case for touch as a fundamental conveyor of musical meaning. Very few recording producers have any notion of how central this is to piano music.
Touch was very beautifully identified as the most alive of all the senses in an op-ed piece in the New York Times of Sunday August 31. The author, a philosophy professor at Boston University, bemoans the replacement of human touch, that most sensitive event, with touchscreen, its exact opposite.
In order to cultivate touch there must be sound differentials, many of which, once innate to the piano, are being engineered out of piano design. Take the difference between white and black key leverage, therefore resonance. It was some ingenious Frenchman who got the idea that all five fingers should sound alike, whence probably came the notion that all keys should sound alike, whence came the inability to hear slight differences between tone qualities associated with leverage, with position of the finger on the key, etc.
These are not things that only advanced pianists hear and use. In fact, many so-called advanced players have such firmly equalified techniques that they can no longer hear tiny differentials in the sounds they make. But children hear the differences and are fascinated by them, as who wouldn't be if given the chance to relish them?
Sorry, folks, commercial recordings just aren't up to the task.
Touch was very beautifully identified as the most alive of all the senses in an op-ed piece in the New York Times of Sunday August 31. The author, a philosophy professor at Boston University, bemoans the replacement of human touch, that most sensitive event, with touchscreen, its exact opposite.
In order to cultivate touch there must be sound differentials, many of which, once innate to the piano, are being engineered out of piano design. Take the difference between white and black key leverage, therefore resonance. It was some ingenious Frenchman who got the idea that all five fingers should sound alike, whence probably came the notion that all keys should sound alike, whence came the inability to hear slight differences between tone qualities associated with leverage, with position of the finger on the key, etc.
These are not things that only advanced pianists hear and use. In fact, many so-called advanced players have such firmly equalified techniques that they can no longer hear tiny differentials in the sounds they make. But children hear the differences and are fascinated by them, as who wouldn't be if given the chance to relish them?
Sorry, folks, commercial recordings just aren't up to the task.
Saturday, September 6, 2014
Listening to Yourself
If this were easy everyone would do it. So why is it so hard?
Reason #1: Children are usually more aware of someone else's ear listening when they do whatever they do with music, whether singing or playing an instrument. Along with that someone else's ear goes judgment: right or wrong, in or out of tune.
#2: Respect must be granted to the power of every single sound to evoke its own response. Tones do not somehow level out to turn into compositions; it is quite the other way around: the impact of single sounds expands out to turn into composition.
I watched this happen today with a piece by Bela Bartok, a master at turning the simplest sounds into complex musical arguments within a single page. The student made one mistake after another until I asked him to exaggerate his "take" on particular sounds: Bring out the ones you find strong and subdue the others guiding your balance on four levels: strong, less strong, sort of weak, weak.
The result was fascinating. What he thought he was doing was not what I heard, yet his errors disappeared and the composition came alive.
Moral of that particular story: There are so many ways to pronounce one's responses to sound: touch, dynamics, timing, to name but three. What the player intends and what the listener hears may or may not match, but what does match in any case is the intensionality that matches the composer's work.
Reason #1: Children are usually more aware of someone else's ear listening when they do whatever they do with music, whether singing or playing an instrument. Along with that someone else's ear goes judgment: right or wrong, in or out of tune.
#2: Respect must be granted to the power of every single sound to evoke its own response. Tones do not somehow level out to turn into compositions; it is quite the other way around: the impact of single sounds expands out to turn into composition.
I watched this happen today with a piece by Bela Bartok, a master at turning the simplest sounds into complex musical arguments within a single page. The student made one mistake after another until I asked him to exaggerate his "take" on particular sounds: Bring out the ones you find strong and subdue the others guiding your balance on four levels: strong, less strong, sort of weak, weak.
The result was fascinating. What he thought he was doing was not what I heard, yet his errors disappeared and the composition came alive.
Moral of that particular story: There are so many ways to pronounce one's responses to sound: touch, dynamics, timing, to name but three. What the player intends and what the listener hears may or may not match, but what does match in any case is the intensionality that matches the composer's work.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Presumptions of Normal
A letter to the editor of The New York Times on August 29 caught my eye: Referring to a recent article about the dangers of eating too much salt this gentleman remarked that without overconsumption of salt he risks dizziness and other unpleasant if not dangerous side effects. When he reaches for the salt shaker at restaurants he is sometimes criticized by complete strangers for his lack of concern about his health.
Such things happen to me all the time. I have learned to ignore the questioning eyebrows when I ask (politely, I hope) for a seat on the subway. I may not look as though I need to sit but I do.
As a child there were many things I simply could not do: simple things that required the reflex that I later learned is the crawling reflex: right arm / left leg diagonal coordination. The presumption was that, since I was smart and also gifted, I should be able to do as others did. Not so. I found this extremely frustrating, especially as I had no way of saying "I can't do that!"
Perhaps that explains why I am so fascinated by people whose inability to imitate is the gateway to the depth of their desire.
Ironically, people who listen to me play have no notion of my ever not being able to do it.
Such things happen to me all the time. I have learned to ignore the questioning eyebrows when I ask (politely, I hope) for a seat on the subway. I may not look as though I need to sit but I do.
As a child there were many things I simply could not do: simple things that required the reflex that I later learned is the crawling reflex: right arm / left leg diagonal coordination. The presumption was that, since I was smart and also gifted, I should be able to do as others did. Not so. I found this extremely frustrating, especially as I had no way of saying "I can't do that!"
Perhaps that explains why I am so fascinated by people whose inability to imitate is the gateway to the depth of their desire.
Ironically, people who listen to me play have no notion of my ever not being able to do it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)